Being homosexual or heterosexual is a choice. Nobody has the right to choose for anybody else what to do with his sexuality so I think that it is the same thing for the marriage. If the "lovers" are happy to be engaged, i don't think that any laws can stop them but they are not totaly free if they cannot celebrate their love as the heterosexuals. So, i would say that i'm for homosexual marriages.
Homosexual marriages are, today, forbid, in France for it isn’t correspond with what we imagine and what it decided in the Constitution of France which said only a men and a women can marry each other. Probably, at least 25 % agree with that. That show, our minds have to involve and in spite of the fact we are in 2012, some people are always narrow-minded. In my mind, prohibit homosexual marriages is a kind of racism. It’s like forbid someone to be who he wants to be. Nobody can forbid someone to be who he wants to be, whatever the way. That’s why I don’t understand, in France, a country which seems evolved and developed, some people and congressman are still against homosexual marriages. France must show others countries the good choice they have to make. It must be an example.
"same thing for..... totally" "are forbidden in France for it doesn't correspond to ........and what is decided.....which precise that a man can only marry a woman....about 25% of our population which shows that ........some people are still narrow-minded...prohibiting.....forbidding.........no matter what...... which seems to be .... congressmen......... show other countries the right choice."
Being homosexual or heterosexual is a choice. Nobody has the right to choose for anybody else what to do with his sexuality so I think that it is the same thing for the marriage. If the "lovers" are happy to be engaged, i don't think that any laws can stop them but they are not totaly free if they cannot celebrate their love as the heterosexuals. So, i would say that i'm for homosexual marriages.
ReplyDeleteHomosexual marriages are, today, forbid, in France for it isn’t correspond with what we imagine and what it decided in the Constitution of France which said only a men and a women can marry each other. Probably, at least 25 % agree with that. That show, our minds have to involve and in spite of the fact we are in 2012, some people are always narrow-minded.
ReplyDeleteIn my mind, prohibit homosexual marriages is a kind of racism. It’s like forbid someone to be who he wants to be. Nobody can forbid someone to be who he wants to be, whatever the way. That’s why I don’t understand, in France, a country which seems evolved and developed, some people and congressman are still against homosexual marriages.
France must show others countries the good choice they have to make. It must be an example.
"same thing for..... totally"
ReplyDelete"are forbidden in France for it doesn't correspond to ........and what is decided.....which precise that a man can only marry a woman....about 25% of our population which shows that ........some people are still narrow-minded...prohibiting.....forbidding.........no matter what...... which seems to be .... congressmen......... show other countries the right choice."